Hi Admins,
Firstly, I'd like to say that I greatly appreciate this subscription-free site and all the hard work you put into it. I do not take for granted such a gift. It's pretty much the perfect site for me. The only comparative site I've seen is pornpics.com, but I find the quality of models higher here and the site is more predictable to navigate. Job well done.
Nevertheless, I'd like to give you some feedback about contributing. I have been contributing quite a lot recently and there are a couple of things that come up repeatedly, which, optimally would not be there. So respectfully, I'd like you to consider some of these and maybe implement some improvements.
1) There are some sets and videos that remain in the tagging list forever. I have no idea why, but some just seem immortal. For example this set below. I must have tagged that at least five times with various combinations of group, trimmed pussy, brunette. Yet it's on the first page of the untagged sets again. I have no idea what's going wrong, maybe you can investigate.
https://www.elitebabes.com/three-little-ballerinas-display-wet-twats-in-the-ball-room-37018/
2) In general, I would like there to be an "under review" status for sets without tags. This status would be reached when someone has made a suggestion for tags. The consequence of this status would be that it doesn't appear in the list of "to be tagged" sets that people get. Only after a moderator rejects the tags, should be reset to "untagged" and appear in the list again. In short there are three states "untagged", "under review" and "tagged" for sets. That way, half a dozen people are not submitting suggestions for the same set.
3) It would be nice if the guidelines are extended for current set of tags. I have set my own standards for "pussy spreading" (a girl mosly does an upside down V with the fingers of one hand and politely pulls her lips apart) and the more aggressive "pussy gaping" (a girl actively pulls her vagina apart and you can clearly see in to it), but others may disagree with my interpretation.
4) It would be nice if there was also a status for suggestion the profile pic of a model. Sometimes you look at a model and there are no solo pics or no pics that resemble the existing guidelines. It would be nice if you could flag this somehow as "profile pic not possible" and this model would then disappear down the back of the queue for a period of time e.g. six months. Often you get the same model again and again, that you simply can't assign a profile pic to. It's a waste of time.
Right that's the main points. Thanks again for a wonderful site.
cheers
MB
21/10/2024 11:25 am
1) https://www.elitebabes.com/contribute/sort/tag_galleries/ should only list galleries that have no tags attached to them. The gallery you linked should not be there. There might have been some strange issue with this gallery, but now its tagged and should not appear there again.
2) I agree. We will remove galleries that are under review, to avoid wasting the time of our Contributors. I will start working on it right now.
3) Added! https://www.elitebabes.com/contribute/sort/contribution_guidelines/
4) Thats a good Idea, but I will have to think about how to best implement this. We could add a button for "Top Contributors" to tag models with "profile pic not available", and then remove it from queue for x months.
Great feedback, thx! If you got more then share, we always listen.
31/10/2024 2:58 pm
2) From now on you will see 'Suggested Tags: #xxx, #xxx under review' on top of each gallery that has a tag suggestion waiting for review at:
https://www.elitebabes.com/contribute/sort/tag_galleries/
https://www.elitebabes.com/contribute/sort/tag_galleries_new/
31/10/2024 5:02 pm
Hi Vertigo,
thanks for the prompt action. I confirm that the change works for regular accounts.
cheers
MB
31/10/2024 10:28 pm
Regarding the extended guidelines. In the example you currently use for pussy spreading the thrid model (the red head) is actually gaping I think. I can see deep into her pussy. There appears to be little difference between this example and the first and fourth examples used for gaping.
Of course other criteria definitions are also missing e.g. when is a picture of an asshole, an asshole gape. My own personal criteria, is when it is so stretched that the pink skin of the inner anus starts to be visible i.e. you're really stretching your butt cheeks apart.
31/10/2024 10:36 pm
After trying it some more, the new implementation seems to work correctly. However for whatever reason the selection of sets is different to before. In the new implementation you get offered 15 fucking pages of sepia photos from Carrie followed by the fucking idiot Louis Jirabert and his poorly lit shitty sets.
Any chance of getting more variation in the sets to tag. Thanks.
Mb
02/11/2024 12:17 am